The image of the spiritual founding of America that generations of Americans have grown up with was created, oddly enough, by a poet of limited talents (to put it in the most magnanimous possible way) who lived two centuries after the event in a country three thousand miles away. Her name was Felicia Dorothea Hemans and she was not American but Welsh. Indeed, she had never been to America and appears to have known next to nothing about the country. It just happened that one day in 1826 her local grocer in Rhyllon, Wales, wrapped her purchases in a sheet of two-year-old newspaper from Boston, and her eye was caught by a small article about a founders’ day celebration in Plymouth. It was very probably the first she had heard of the Mayflower or the Pilgrims. But inspired as only a mediocre poet can be, she dashed off a poem, “The Landing of the Pilgrim Fathers (in New England),” which begins
The breaking waves dashed high
On a stern and rock-bound coast
And the woods, against a stormy sky,
Tneir giant branches toss’d
And the heavy night hung dark
The hills and water o’er,
Men a band of exiles moor’d their bark
On the wild New England shore
and carries on in a vigorously grandiloquent, indeterminately rhyming vein for a further eight stanzas. Although the poem was replete with errors—the Mayflower was not a bark, it was not night when they moored, Plymouth was not “where first they trod” but in fact marked their fourth visit ashore—it became an instant classic, and formed the essential image of the Mayflower landing thatmost Americans carry with them to this day.*
The one thing the Pilgrims certainly didn’t do was step ashore on Plymouth Rock. Quite apart from the consideration that it may have stood well above the high-water mark in 1620, no prudent mariner would try to bring a ship alongside a boulder in a heaving December sea when a sheltered inlet beckoned nearby. If the Pilgrims even noticed Plymouth Rock, there is no sign of it. No mention of the rock is found among any of the surviving documents and letters of the age, and indeed it doesn’t make its first recorded appearance until 1715, almost a century later.1 Not until about the time Ms. Hemans wrote her swooping epic did Plymouth Rock become indelibly associated with the landing of the Pilgrims.
Wherever they landed, we can assume that the 102 Pilgrims stepped from their storm-tossed little ship with unsteady legs and huge relief. They had just spent nine and a half damp and perilous weeks at sea, crammed together on a creaking vessel small enough to be parked on a modern tennis court. The crew, with the customary graciousness of sailors, referred to them as puke stockings, on account of their apparently boundless ability to spatter the latter with the former, though in fact they had handled the experience reasonably well.’ Only one passenger had died en route, and two had been added through births (one of whom ever after reveled in the exuberant name of Oceanus Hopkins).
They called themselves Saints. Those members of the party who were not Saints they called Strangers. Pilgrims in reference to these early voyagers would not become common for another two hundred years. Even later was Founding Fathers. It isn’t found until the twentieth century, in a speech by Warren G. Harding. Nor, strictly speaking, is it correct to call them Puritans. They were Separatists, so called because they had left the Church of England. Puritans were those who remained in the Anglican Church but wished to purify it. They wouldn’t arrive in America for another decade, but when they did they would quickly eclipse, and eventually absorb, this little original colony.
It would be difficult to imagine a group of people more ill-suited to a life in the wilderness. They packed as if they had misunderstood the purpose of the trip, They found room for sundials and candle snuffers, a drum, a trumpet, and a complete history of Turkey. One William Mullins packed 126 pairs of shoes and thirteen pairs of boots. Yet they failed to bring a single cow or horse, plow or fishing line. Among the professions represented on the Mayflower’s manifest were two tailors, a printer, several merchants, a silk worker, a shopkeeper, and a hatter—occupations whose indispensability is not immediately evident when one thinks of surviving in a hostile environment.3 Their military commander, Miles Standish, Was so diminutive of stature that he was known to all as “Captain Shrimpe”4—hardly a figure to inspire awe in the savage natives, whom they confidently expected to encounter. With the uncertain exception of the little captain, probably none in the party had ever tried to bring down a wild animal. Hunting in seventeenth-century Europe was a sport reserved for the aristocracy. Even those who labeled themselves farmers generally had scant practical knowledge of husbandry, since farmer in the 1600s, and for some time afterward, signified an owner of land rather than one who worked it.
They were, in short, dangerously unprepared for the rigors ahead, and they demonstrated their incompetence in the most dramatic possible way: by dying in droves. Six expired in the first two weeks, eight the next month, seventeen more in February, a further thirteen in March. By April, when the Mayflower set sail back to England,* just fifty-four people, nearly half of them children, were left to begin the long work of turning this tenuous toehold into a self-sustaining colony.5
Word list
damp fuktig
perilous farliga
vessel fartyg
en route på färden
exuberant översvallande
snuffers släckare
manifest passagerarlista
merchants handelsmän
hatter hattmakare
hostile fientlig
diminutive of stature liten till växten
awe fruktan
savage vilda
natives infödingar
encounter stöta på
labelled themselves sa sig vara
scant mycket lite
husbandry jordbruk
rigours strapatser
manifest uppenbara
incompetence oduglighet
in droves i mängder
expired dog
tenuous obetydlig
toehold fotfäste
self-sustaining självhushållande
remove steg
conceive förstå
hapless olycklig
kindred av samma sort
vast vidsträckt
hue utseende
mien utseende
fast starka
corn majs
thriving lyckades bra
agglomerative som har gyttrats ihop
formidable väldiga
clusters klungor
untutored olärda
primer nybörjarbok
feat prestation
incidentally händelsevis
gifted begåvade
linguists språkvetare
convenient bekväma
assurance säkerhet
into the bargain med på köpet
straggly spretigt
perished gått under
aptly passande
cod torsk
stocks lager
declined tackade nej
prey on plundra
presumption antagandet
sluggish långsamma
booty byte
privateers kapare
the distinction
of being särskiljer sig pga
reconnoitring party rekogniseringstrupp
alas tyvärr
incorporated tagit in
tongue språk
fate öde
durable varaktiga
ever-precarious alltid osäkra
unimaginably otänkbara
bounteous rikliga
replenish fylla på
stocks lager
scarcely knappast
relic minnesmärke
cast-iron smidesjärn
crass kolossal
injudiciousness omdömeslöshet
captivity fångenskap
terra incognita okänd mark
endure återstår
diligently noggrant
taking heed tagit i akt
of his own devising som var hans eget påfund
consummate fulländad
brown-nosing inställsamhet, fjäsk
heir apparent trolig arvinge
humbly entreating ödmjukt fråga
posterity eftervärlden
with relish med förtjusning
whimsical egendomlig
took his fancy föll honom i smaken
implausible osannolik
interpreter tolk
smallpox smittkoppor
disgruntled missnöjda
inadvertently av misstag
exterminated utrotade
Questions
- Give three examples of how the Pilgrim Fathers were unprepared for the new life in America.
- What, according to Bryson, is the reason that some of the pilgrims managed to survive in the new country?
- Why was it improbable that the English had learned how to speak the natives’ language?
- Give two reasons for why the English began sailing to America.
- Queen Elisabeth established a colony in Virginia to provide a supply base for privateers. What happened to this first colony?
- Explain how one of the Indians, Samoset, had learned English.
- Why were many of the places in New England given English names instead of Indian?
- Give reasons for the fact that the native Squanto had every reason to be disappointed in the English.
Answers
- They didn’t bring tools that could help them survive. They were not used to hunting. They had little knowledge of farming.
- That they got help from the Indians on how to hunt and grow plants.
- Because it was such a hard language to learn and that the pilgrims were hardly used to learning new languages. Furthermore, two of the Indians spoke English so the pilgrims didn’t have to learn their language.
- British fishermen lost access to the fishing grounds off Iceland and discovered the cod-rich waters off Newfoundland. There were also English ships that sailed to America to prey on Spanish treasure ships.
- It was deserted. At least some of the English must have joined Indian tribes and had children with the women.
- Samoset had learned English from the fishermen who came to the area to dry fish, replenish stocks of food and water etc.
- Because John Smith asked Charles Stuart (the heir apparent) if he could change the Indian names to English names connected to the Royal family.
- He might have been forced into travelling to England where he worked for nine years. He was kidnapped by another Englishman and sold as a slave in Malaga. When he came back to America his tribe had been wiped out by a plague (probably smallpox that came with the English).
Hi!
Could you please give me the answers to the 8 questions? I can’t answer them all..
Thank you
Love Lottie
I have now included the answers on the same page as the article.